600-842 CE
From 600 to 842 CE, the Pyu built the first great civilization of the Irrawaddy valley — city-states of circular walls and Buddhist monasteries where monks chanted in Pali and kings raised stupas to rival any in India. Chinese envoys marveled at their peaceful ways and sacred music, their silver currency and irrigated rice fields, until Nanzhao raiders swept down from Yunnan and carried their people away into slavery, leaving only brick ruins for the Burmans who would inherit their land.
The Pyu were the first urbanizers of the Irrawaddy Valley, builders of walled cities that flourished for centuries before the Burmans who would eventually succeed them arrived. Their origins remain debated — they spoke a Tibeto-Burman language and may have migrated southward from the Yunnan plateau — but by the early centuries of the common era, they had established prosperous city-states across the fertile plains of what is now central Myanmar. Chinese chronicles described them as a gentle, Buddhist people who shaved their heads, wore cotton garments, and settled disputes through negotiation rather than violence whenever possible.
What distinguished the Pyu was their synthesis of Indian religion, local agriculture, and strategic commerce. They adopted Buddhism with fervor — not the Mahayana forms prevalent in China but the Theravada tradition that would later define mainland Southeast Asian civilization. Their cities became pilgrimage centers, their monasteries repositories of learning, their rulers patrons of religious architecture that still impresses archaeologists today. Yet they were also practical traders who profited from routes connecting China to India, their cities positioned to benefit from every caravan passing through.
The Pyu heartland lay in the dry zone of central Burma, where the Irrawaddy River flows through plains that receive enough rain for rice cultivation but not so much as to breed the jungle that smothers ruins elsewhere in Southeast Asia. This was fortunate landscape: fertile enough for dense population, open enough for the construction of massive cities whose walls enclosed areas larger than contemporary European capitals. Sri Ksetra, the greatest Pyu city, covered nearly fifty square kilometers — a vast urban space of monasteries, palaces, workshops, and the homes of tens of thousands.
Rice was the foundation of Pyu prosperity. The plains could support intensive wet-rice agriculture that yielded surpluses sufficient to feed monks, craftsmen, and merchants who produced nothing edible themselves. Irrigation systems channeled river water to fields; granaries stored reserves against drought years. This agricultural abundance freed population for religion and commerce — the twin pillars of Pyu civilization. Monasteries dotted the landscape; markets welcomed traders from distant lands; and the surplus rice itself became an export, feeding less fortunate neighbors in exchange for luxuries the Pyu could not produce.
The Pyu were not remembered as warriors. Chinese sources praised their reluctance to shed blood, their preference for resolving conflicts through diplomacy and compensation rather than battle. This may reflect Buddhist influence — the faith discouraged killing — or practical calculation by a people whose wealth lay in trade and agriculture rather than conquest. Their cities had walls, massive ones, but these were as much status symbols and flood protection as military fortifications. The Pyu relied on their position — difficult terrain surrounding the Irrawaddy Valley, distance from aggressive neighbors — more than on armies.
This strategic calculation worked for centuries but failed catastrophically when circumstances changed. In 832 CE, the Nanzhao kingdom from Yunnan launched a devastating raid that sacked the major Pyu cities and carried off thousands of captives, including skilled musicians and craftsmen whose talents Nanzhao coveted. The Pyu never recovered. Their cities continued in diminished form, but political power had shattered, and over the following centuries, Burman migrants absorbed or displaced the surviving population. The Pyu vanished as a distinct people, leaving behind only ruins, inscriptions, and the Buddhist traditions they had helped establish.
Buddhism permeated every aspect of Pyu life. Kings legitimized their rule through religious patronage, constructing stupas and monasteries that proclaimed their piety to gods and subjects alike. Monks formed a privileged class, supported by donations, exempt from taxation, devoted to study and meditation. The Theravada tradition they followed emphasized individual salvation through moral conduct and mental discipline — a path open to anyone regardless of birth. Ordinary Pyu accumulated merit through generosity to monasteries, participation in festivals, and observation of Buddhist precepts. Life was preparation for better rebirth or, ideally, escape from rebirth entirely.
Yet older beliefs persisted beneath the Buddhist surface. Spirit worship — the veneration of nats — continued in homes and villages, and Buddhist institutions learned to accommodate rather than suppress these practices. The Pyu cremated their dead in Buddhist fashion, collecting bones and ashes in urns for burial beneath small stupas, but grave goods suggest beliefs about afterlife needs that orthodox Buddhism would not endorse. This synthesis of Indian religion and local tradition created something distinctively Pyu — and set patterns that would continue in Burmese Buddhism for the next millennium.
The Pyu sat at a crossroads of Asian trade. Routes from China descended through the mountains to their cities; routes from India crossed the Bay of Bengal and ascended the Irrawaddy. Merchants brought silk, ceramics, precious metals, and ideas; they departed with rice, forest products, and goods transshipped from the other direction. The Pyu themselves traveled widely — a Pyu musical troupe performed at the Tang Chinese court in 802, impressing the emperor with instruments and compositions that combined Indian and local traditions. This cultural exchange enriched Pyu civilization while spreading Pyu influence across the region.
The Pyu legacy outlasted the Pyu themselves. When Burman kings built their capitals at Pagan and later Mandalay, they inherited Pyu religious traditions, Pyu urban patterns, and Pyu relationships with the wider Buddhist world. The Theravada Buddhism that defines Myanmar today traces its roots through Pyu monasteries. The irrigation techniques that still water Burmese rice paddies descend from Pyu engineering. Even the artistic styles of medieval Burma echo Pyu originals. A people vanished; their civilization continued under new management, transformed but recognizable, a foundation for everything that followed.
In Glory of Civilizations, the Pyu embody a civilization where Buddhist devotion and agricultural prosperity reinforced each other. Using faith cubes to recruit units reflects a society where religious merit translated into practical power — monasteries training not just monks but the craftsmen and laborers who built cities. The action cube recovery when overcoming adversity captures Pyu resilience and efficiency, a people who found ways to continue working even when setbacks occurred.
Gaining food from every meadow hex in your provinces represents the wet-rice agriculture that supported Pyu urban civilization — abundance flowing from the land without requiring workers on every field. Starting trade transactions reflects their commercial position at the crossroads of Asian exchange, where markets functioned as naturally as monasteries prayed.
Yes. The ability grants you 3 trade transactions directly, independent of how many Markets you have.
No. Each transaction must involve a different product. You cannot buy or sell the same product twice in a single trade action.
It means you recover an action cube that was already spent. Moving it from your player mat (where used cubes sit) to your player zone makes it available to use again this round — essentially giving you an extra action.
Yes. You gain 1 food for each meadow hex in your provinces during the achievement phase, regardless of whether peasants are present.
Yes. When recruiting any unit, you may spend faith cubes instead of an equal amount of required resources. This applies to all resource costs, including the wood needed for Archers.